Summary not yet generated for this topic.
At a glance
Declining — less community discussion. 0 comments in the last 30 days, 15 the 60 before.
Ron Larson, a resident, opposed the Fortner rezone, citing concerns about increased multi-family dwellings in his neighborhood and the change from single-family character.
City Council on 2026-03-10 5:15 PM - *Amended Agenda* - Mar 10, 2026→Shannon Maynard opposed the Fortner rezone, stating many neighbors share concerns about preserving the neighborhood's single-family character, safety, and density.
City Council on 2026-03-10 5:15 PM - *Amended Agenda* - Mar 10, 2026→Miriam Tucker opposed the Fortner rezone, believing the proposed development does not fit the neighborhood and may set a precedent for future rezones.
City Council on 2026-03-10 5:15 PM - *Amended Agenda* - Mar 10, 2026→Mike Dearcott strongly opposed the Fortner rezone, stating the neighborhood is mainly single-family homes and he does not support higher density developments.
Expressed concern about the precedent set by rezoning and its impact on the single-family residential character of the area.
City Council on 2026-03-03 5:15 PM - Mar 3, 2026→Opposed the rezone to higher density, citing concerns about traffic, street parking, and impact on home values.
City Council on 2026-03-03 5:15 PM - Mar 3, 2026→Opposed the higher density zoning, citing concerns about potential rentals and safety issues in the area.
City Council on 2026-03-03 5:15 PM - Mar 3, 2026→Opposed the rezone, believing it would create traffic and safety issues at an already difficult intersection.
City Council on 2026-03-03 5:15 PM - Mar 3, 2026→Expressed concern about the crosswalk at 8600 S. and 1000 E., asking for the development to be contingent on its improvement or for the city to hold off on approval until it's fixed.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→Shared concerns relating to the crosswalk at 8600 S. and 1000 E.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→Shared concerns relating to safety.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→Questioned if the same development requirements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, property dedication for street width) would be imposed on this developer as were on him, noting the current concept lacks these.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→Stated the development sets a bad standard for the neighborhood and does not support the project, citing density and traffic concerns.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→Argued the property should remain zoned for single-family homes, noting the area's growth has been into single-family lots, not higher density, and that the proposed density is double the current average.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→Shared concerns about traffic and safety related to the development.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→Shared concerns about traffic and safety related to the development.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→Shared concerns relating to safety.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→Shared concerns relating to safety and the crosswalk.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→Asked how the development aligns with current zoning.
Planning Commission on 2026-02-19 6:15 PM - Feb 19, 2026→