Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (3)Opposed (1)Concerned (4)Neutral (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 7, 2025.
Public comments (9)
NeutralDallas ChappanAug 7, 2025
Asked why his father's property is being asked to join the subdivision.
Planning Commission - Aug 7, 2025 · 30:49 →ConcernedMike MilliganAug 7, 2025
Concerned about the impact on the gully, property values, and wildlife.
Planning Commission - Aug 7, 2025 · 25:33 →ConcernedSteven CrapoAug 7, 2025
Asked about a discrepancy in the survey drawing regarding his property line.
Planning Commission - Aug 7, 2025 · 39:32 →SupportiveMarvin KoontzAug 7, 2025
Supports the development to reduce fire hazards caused by weeds on the property.
Planning Commission - Aug 7, 2025 · 23:46 →SupportiveAnn HansenAug 7, 2025
Supports the development as the best use of the land.
Planning Commission - Aug 7, 2025 · 36:48 →OpposedZach CrawfordAug 7, 2025
Concerned about density and traffic in Historic Sandy.
Planning Commission - Aug 7, 2025 · 41:32 →SupportiveScott CadellAug 7, 2025
Supports the development as a way to clean up an unsightly area and help the neighborhood.
Planning Commission - Aug 7, 2025 · 15:37 →ConcernedZamiAug 7, 2025
Concerned about traffic safety near the park.
Planning Commission - Aug 7, 2025 · 28:59 →ConcernedRichard Vander HeideAug 7, 2025
Concerned about loss of sunlight and privacy from potential two-story homes on the north side.
Planning Commission - Aug 7, 2025 · 12:28 →