Falls Creek Estates Subdivision Appeal

The appellant's attorney argued that the proposed road does not meet the definition of a private lane and should be a private street, requiring different standards. He also raised concerns about the impact on shared access easements and the buildability of a remnant parcel.

The appellant added that it's agreed the road is not a private lane, and argued it cannot be a shared driveway either due to its length, requiring emergency vehicle access. He also stated that the proposed driveway is on his property and that the numbers on the plat indicate the road will be over 150 feet, making it impossible to shorten to meet private lane requirements.